71%

Page 5 – Policy Framework Overview

The Province defines the categories below. To be designated as Provincially Significant, a project must fit one or more of these types. The definitions here are provided for reference by the Province. You’ll see these options again when you’re asked to choose your top five. We don’t recommend any option.

Draft (max 500 characters)

0/500

Project risks vs benefits

This Framework insufficiently assesses project risks. For example, a project could present unacceptably high environmental risks but still pass the Framework as written. Eligibility, benefits, and core requirements are currently scoped widely, so that almost any project that brings large investment can be designated, with minimal consideration of risks.
The Framework largely does not address a core common issue with major projects, which is that benefits may be over-estimated in assessment, whereas risks are under-considered in a rush to see projects greenlit. This includes not just environment and climate risks, but risks of cost-overruns, under-delivery of claimed community benefits, stranded assets if a project is abandoned, etc.

Free, prior and informed consent

The Infrastructure Projects Act should be amended to clarify that free, prior, informed consent from First Nations’ titleholders is required before a project may be designated, and before any of the tools provided for in the Act are utilized.

Draft (max 500 characters)

0/500

Transparency before designation

The Act must ensure transparency and accountability BEFORE the decision is made to designate. The Minister should be required to publicly post the eligibility assessment and information submitted before making the decision, and to have a public comment period. This is particularly critical if a project is going to be exempted from any environmental requirements so the public can understand what information was assessed before designation to understand the benefits/risks of the project.

Monitoring and Reporting

There should be an evaluation, monitoring and reporting process to publicly assess whether designated projects actually have been approved and constructed any faster than through normal procedures, the amount of public funds expended, whether the project delivered on the benefits claimed, the exemptions and streamlined processes used under the Act for a specific project, and environmental monitoring conducted to report on environmental impacts for the project.

Benefits as a condition of Environment Assessment approval

Any public benefits claimed by the project proponent (including reconciliation, environmental benefits or job guarantees) should be made a condition of Environmental Assessment or permit approval.